Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Computer Hardware Engineers Salary: North Dakota vs Arizona

Computer Hardware Engineers earn a median of $73,390 in North Dakota and $163,090 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $89,700 (-55.0%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,390
North Dakota median
$82,499 after COL
$163,090
Arizona median
$161,993 after COL
-55.0%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
-49.1%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $89,700 more per year than North Dakota for computer hardware engineers, a gap of +55.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $79,495 of extra purchasing power (+49.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer hardware engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer Hardware Engineers

North Dakota

Median salary
$73,390
Mean salary
$83,780
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$82,499
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Hardware Engineers page for North Dakota →

Computer Hardware Engineers

Arizona

Median salary
$163,090
Mean salary
$155,730
Employment
3,390
Location quotient
2.16
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$161,993
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Hardware Engineers page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer hardware engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.