Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Computer Systems Analysts Salary: Nevada vs Colorado

Computer Systems Analysts earn a median of $101,810 in Nevada and $124,010 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $22,200 (-17.9%), with Colorado paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$101,810
Nevada median
$101,831 after COL
$124,010
Colorado median
$120,337 after COL
-17.9%
Nominal gap
Colorado leads
-15.4%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Colorado pays $22,200 more per year than Nevada for computer systems analysts, a gap of +17.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Colorado still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,506 of extra purchasing power (+15.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for computer systems analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Computer Systems Analysts

Nevada

Median salary
$101,810
Mean salary
$100,960
Employment
2,500
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$101,831
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Systems Analysts page for Nevada →

Computer Systems Analysts

Colorado

Median salary
$124,010
Mean salary
$127,060
Employment
7,130
Location quotient
0.76
Jobs per 1,000
2.5
COL-adjusted median
$120,337
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Computer Systems Analysts page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into computer systems analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.