Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Conservation Scientists Salary: New York vs North Dakota

Conservation Scientists earn a median of $65,550 in New York and $79,790 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $14,240 (-17.8%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,550
New York median
$60,739 after COL
$79,790
North Dakota median
$89,693 after COL
-17.8%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
-32.3%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $14,240 more per year than New York for conservation scientists, a gap of +17.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,954 of extra purchasing power (+32.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conservation scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conservation Scientists

New York

Median salary
$65,550
Mean salary
$82,150
Employment
750
Location quotient
0.47
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$60,739
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for New York →

Conservation Scientists

North Dakota

Median salary
$79,790
Mean salary
$81,080
Employment
260
Location quotient
3.64
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$89,693
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into conservation scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.