Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Conservation Scientists Salary: North Carolina vs Oregon

Conservation Scientists earn a median of $61,820 in North Carolina and $86,170 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $24,350 (-28.3%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$61,820
North Carolina median
$65,539 after COL
$86,170
Oregon median
$83,368 after COL
-28.3%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-21.4%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $24,350 more per year than North Carolina for conservation scientists, a gap of +28.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,829 of extra purchasing power (+21.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conservation scientists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conservation Scientists

North Carolina

Median salary
$61,820
Mean salary
$69,170
Employment
570
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$65,539
Regional Price Parity
94.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for North Carolina →

Conservation Scientists

Oregon

Median salary
$86,170
Mean salary
$90,780
Employment
880
Location quotient
2.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$83,368
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conservation Scientists page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into conservation scientists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.