Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Construction Laborers Salary: Washington vs Illinois

Construction Laborers earn a median of $57,240 in Washington and $64,890 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $7,650 (-11.8%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$57,240
Washington median
$53,489 after COL
$64,890
Illinois median
$64,917 after COL
-11.8%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-17.6%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $7,650 more per year than Washington for construction laborers, a gap of +11.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,428 of extra purchasing power (+17.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for construction laborers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Construction Laborers

Washington

Median salary
$57,240
Mean salary
$60,380
Employment
27,410
Location quotient
1.13
Jobs per 1,000
7.7
COL-adjusted median
$53,489
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Laborers page for Washington →

Construction Laborers

Illinois

Median salary
$64,890
Mean salary
$69,570
Employment
31,960
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
5.3
COL-adjusted median
$64,917
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Construction Laborers page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into construction laborers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.