Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Conveyor Operators And Tenders Salary: Nevada vs Alabama

Conveyor Operators And Tenders earn a median of $35,910 in Nevada and $54,480 in Alabama. That is a nominal gap of $18,570 (-34.1%), with Alabama paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,910
Nevada median
$35,918 after COL
$54,480
Alabama median
$61,335 after COL
-34.1%
Nominal gap
Alabama leads
-41.4%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alabama pays $18,570 more per year than Nevada for conveyor operators and tenders, a gap of +34.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alabama still comes out ahead, with roughly $25,418 of extra purchasing power (+41.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for conveyor operators and tenders in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Conveyor Operators And Tenders

Nevada

Median salary
$35,910
Mean salary
$38,840
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$35,918
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conveyor Operators And Tenders page for Nevada →

Conveyor Operators And Tenders

Alabama

Median salary
$54,480
Mean salary
$50,650
Employment
310
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$61,335
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Conveyor Operators And Tenders page for Alabama →

Related pages

Keep digging into conveyor operators and tenders from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.