Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cooks, Fast Food Salary: Maine vs Massachusetts

Cooks, Fast Food earn a median of $35,780 in Maine and $37,100 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $1,320 (-3.6%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$35,780
Maine median
$36,868 after COL
$37,100
Massachusetts median
$35,080 after COL
-3.6%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+5.1%
Adjusted gap
Maine leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $1,320 more per year than Maine for cooks, fast food, a gap of +3.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Maine actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,787 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, fast food in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Fast Food

Maine

Median salary
$35,780
Mean salary
$36,400
Employment
1,970
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
3.1
COL-adjusted median
$36,868
Regional Price Parity
97.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Maine →

Cooks, Fast Food

Massachusetts

Median salary
$37,100
Mean salary
$38,190
Employment
5,140
Location quotient
0.33
Jobs per 1,000
1.4
COL-adjusted median
$35,080
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Fast Food page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, fast food from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.