Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria Salary: Illinois vs Hawaii

Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria earn a median of $36,430 in Illinois and $47,250 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $10,820 (-22.9%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,430
Illinois median
$36,445 after COL
$47,250
Hawaii median
$42,974 after COL
-22.9%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-15.2%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $10,820 more per year than Illinois for cooks, institution and cafeteria, a gap of +22.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,528 of extra purchasing power (+15.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cooks, institution and cafeteria in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria

Illinois

Median salary
$36,430
Mean salary
$38,050
Employment
22,850
Location quotient
1.30
Jobs per 1,000
3.8
COL-adjusted median
$36,445
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria page for Illinois →

Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria

Hawaii

Median salary
$47,250
Mean salary
$50,250
Employment
1,270
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$42,974
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cooks, Institution And Cafeteria page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into cooks, institution and cafeteria from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.