Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Correctional Officers And Jailers Salary: Montana vs New Jersey

Correctional Officers And Jailers earn a median of $49,700 in Montana and $90,150 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $40,450 (-44.9%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,700
Montana median
$52,512 after COL
$90,150
New Jersey median
$82,855 after COL
-44.9%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-36.6%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $40,450 more per year than Montana for correctional officers and jailers, a gap of +44.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,343 of extra purchasing power (+36.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for correctional officers and jailers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Correctional Officers And Jailers

Montana

Median salary
$49,700
Mean salary
$53,990
Employment
1,320
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
2.6
COL-adjusted median
$52,512
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Correctional Officers And Jailers page for Montana →

Correctional Officers And Jailers

New Jersey

Median salary
$90,150
Mean salary
$83,990
Employment
7,840
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$82,855
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Correctional Officers And Jailers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into correctional officers and jailers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.