Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Costume Attendants Salary: Oregon vs Georgia

Costume Attendants earn a median of $37,840 in Oregon and $68,390 in Georgia. That is a nominal gap of $30,550 (-44.7%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,840
Oregon median
$36,610 after COL
$68,390
Georgia median
$71,023 after COL
-44.7%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
-48.5%
Adjusted gap
Georgia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $30,550 more per year than Oregon for costume attendants, a gap of +44.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Georgia still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,413 of extra purchasing power (+48.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for costume attendants in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Costume Attendants

Oregon

Median salary
$37,840
Mean salary
$49,200
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$36,610
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Costume Attendants page for Oregon →

Costume Attendants

Georgia

Median salary
$68,390
Mean salary
$64,610
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.27
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$71,023
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Costume Attendants page for Georgia →

Related pages

Keep digging into costume attendants from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.