Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Credit Analysts Salary: Illinois vs Alabama

Credit Analysts earn a median of $81,380 in Illinois and $101,050 in Alabama. That is a nominal gap of $19,670 (-19.5%), with Alabama paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,380
Illinois median
$81,414 after COL
$101,050
Alabama median
$113,766 after COL
-19.5%
Nominal gap
Alabama leads
-28.4%
Adjusted gap
Alabama leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alabama pays $19,670 more per year than Illinois for credit analysts, a gap of +19.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Alabama still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,351 of extra purchasing power (+28.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for credit analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Credit Analysts

Illinois

Median salary
$81,380
Mean salary
$97,680
Employment
2,960
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$81,414
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for Illinois →

Credit Analysts

Alabama

Median salary
$101,050
Mean salary
$103,280
Employment
310
Location quotient
0.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$113,766
Regional Price Parity
88.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for Alabama →

Related pages

Keep digging into credit analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.