Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Credit Analysts Salary: Nevada vs District of Columbia

Credit Analysts earn a median of $64,500 in Nevada and $103,530 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $39,030 (-37.7%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$64,500
Nevada median
$64,514 after COL
$103,530
District of Columbia median
$94,203 after COL
-37.7%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-31.5%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $39,030 more per year than Nevada for credit analysts, a gap of +37.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $29,689 of extra purchasing power (+31.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for credit analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Credit Analysts

Nevada

Median salary
$64,500
Mean salary
$77,180
Employment
410
Location quotient
0.61
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$64,514
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for Nevada →

Credit Analysts

District of Columbia

Median salary
$103,530
Mean salary
$122,740
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.20
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$94,203
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into credit analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.