Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Credit Analysts Salary: New Jersey vs Colorado

Credit Analysts earn a median of $100,210 in New Jersey and $95,670 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $4,540 (+4.7%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,210
New Jersey median
$92,101 after COL
$95,670
Colorado median
$92,837 after COL
+4.7%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-0.8%
Adjusted gap
Colorado leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $4,540 more per year than Colorado for credit analysts, a gap of +4.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Colorado actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $736 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for credit analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Credit Analysts

New Jersey

Median salary
$100,210
Mean salary
$108,040
Employment
1,810
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$92,101
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for New Jersey →

Credit Analysts

Colorado

Median salary
$95,670
Mean salary
$112,280
Employment
950
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$92,837
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Credit Analysts page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into credit analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.