Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Crossing Guards And Flaggers Salary: California vs South Dakota

Crossing Guards And Flaggers earn a median of $49,310 in California and $50,260 in South Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $950 (-1.9%), with South Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,310
California median
$44,536 after COL
$50,260
South Dakota median
$56,736 after COL
-1.9%
Nominal gap
South Dakota leads
-21.5%
Adjusted gap
South Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, South Dakota pays $950 more per year than California for crossing guards and flaggers, a gap of +1.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, South Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $12,200 of extra purchasing power (+21.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for crossing guards and flaggers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Crossing Guards And Flaggers

California

Median salary
$49,310
Mean salary
$56,490
Employment
7,560
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$44,536
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crossing Guards And Flaggers page for California →

Crossing Guards And Flaggers

South Dakota

Median salary
$50,260
Mean salary
$47,290
Employment
100
Location quotient
0.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$56,736
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Crossing Guards And Flaggers page for South Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into crossing guards and flaggers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.