Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Curators Salary: New Jersey vs Connecticut

Curators earn a median of $65,930 in New Jersey and $73,350 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $7,420 (-10.1%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$65,930
New Jersey median
$60,595 after COL
$73,350
Connecticut median
$70,794 after COL
-10.1%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-14.4%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $7,420 more per year than New Jersey for curators, a gap of +10.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,200 of extra purchasing power (+14.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for curators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Curators

New Jersey

Median salary
$65,930
Mean salary
$68,800
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$60,595
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Curators page for New Jersey →

Curators

Connecticut

Median salary
$73,350
Mean salary
$78,770
Employment
200
Location quotient
1.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$70,794
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Curators page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into curators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.