Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Customer Service Representatives Salary: Tennessee vs Washington

Customer Service Representatives earn a median of $40,130 in Tennessee and $49,150 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $9,020 (-18.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$40,130
Tennessee median
$43,681 after COL
$49,150
Washington median
$45,929 after COL
-18.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.9%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $9,020 more per year than Tennessee for customer service representatives, a gap of +18.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,248 of extra purchasing power (+4.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for customer service representatives in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Customer Service Representatives

Tennessee

Median salary
$40,130
Mean salary
$42,980
Employment
64,880
Location quotient
1.12
Jobs per 1,000
19.8
COL-adjusted median
$43,681
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Customer Service Representatives page for Tennessee →

Customer Service Representatives

Washington

Median salary
$49,150
Mean salary
$54,410
Employment
44,880
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
12.7
COL-adjusted median
$45,929
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Customer Service Representatives page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into customer service representatives from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.