Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand Salary: Massachusetts vs Nebraska

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand earn a median of $41,410 in Massachusetts and $47,250 in Nebraska. That is a nominal gap of $5,840 (-12.4%), with Nebraska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$41,410
Massachusetts median
$39,156 after COL
$47,250
Nebraska median
$52,440 after COL
-12.4%
Nominal gap
Nebraska leads
-25.3%
Adjusted gap
Nebraska leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nebraska pays $5,840 more per year than Massachusetts for cutters and trimmers, hand, a gap of +12.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nebraska still comes out ahead, with roughly $13,284 of extra purchasing power (+25.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for cutters and trimmers, hand in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand

Massachusetts

Median salary
$41,410
Mean salary
$43,140
Employment
120
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$39,156
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cutters And Trimmers, Hand page for Massachusetts →

Cutters And Trimmers, Hand

Nebraska

Median salary
$47,250
Mean salary
$47,900
Employment
60
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,440
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Cutters And Trimmers, Hand page for Nebraska →

Related pages

Keep digging into cutters and trimmers, hand from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.