Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Demonstrators And Product Promoters Salary: New Hampshire vs Hawaii

Demonstrators And Product Promoters earn a median of $38,770 in New Hampshire and $43,960 in Hawaii. That is a nominal gap of $5,190 (-11.8%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,770
New Hampshire median
$37,220 after COL
$43,960
Hawaii median
$39,981 after COL
-11.8%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-6.9%
Adjusted gap
Hawaii leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $5,190 more per year than New Hampshire for demonstrators and product promoters, a gap of +11.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Hawaii still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,762 of extra purchasing power (+6.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for demonstrators and product promoters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Demonstrators And Product Promoters

New Hampshire

Median salary
$38,770
Mean salary
$42,750
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$37,220
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Demonstrators And Product Promoters page for New Hampshire →

Demonstrators And Product Promoters

Hawaii

Median salary
$43,960
Mean salary
$41,860
Employment
390
Location quotient
1.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$39,981
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Demonstrators And Product Promoters page for Hawaii →

Related pages

Keep digging into demonstrators and product promoters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.