Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Dentists, All Other Specialists Salary: Minnesota vs Texas

Dentists, All Other Specialists earn a median of $129,990 in Minnesota and $227,570 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $97,580 (-42.9%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$129,990
Minnesota median
$131,808 after COL
$227,570
Texas median
$234,470 after COL
-42.9%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-43.8%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $97,580 more per year than Minnesota for dentists, all other specialists, a gap of +42.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $102,663 of extra purchasing power (+43.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dentists, all other specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dentists, All Other Specialists

Minnesota

Median salary
$129,990
Mean salary
$147,810
Employment
330
Location quotient
2.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$131,808
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dentists, All Other Specialists page for Minnesota →

Dentists, All Other Specialists

Texas

Median salary
$227,570
Mean salary
$244,950
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$234,470
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dentists, All Other Specialists page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into dentists, all other specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.