Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Dietetic Technicians Salary: Oklahoma vs New Hampshire

Dietetic Technicians earn a median of $37,770 in Oklahoma and $47,440 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $9,670 (-20.4%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$37,770
Oklahoma median
$42,997 after COL
$47,440
New Hampshire median
$45,543 after COL
-20.4%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-5.6%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $9,670 more per year than Oklahoma for dietetic technicians, a gap of +20.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,546 of extra purchasing power (+5.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietetic technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietetic Technicians

Oklahoma

Median salary
$37,770
Mean salary
$38,440
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$42,997
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietetic Technicians page for Oklahoma →

Dietetic Technicians

New Hampshire

Median salary
$47,440
Mean salary
$45,430
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.38
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,543
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietetic Technicians page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietetic technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.