Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Dietetic Technicians Salary: Washington vs Minnesota

Dietetic Technicians earn a median of $45,310 in Washington and $45,410 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $100 (-0.2%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,310
Washington median
$42,341 after COL
$45,410
Minnesota median
$46,045 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-8.0%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $100 more per year than Washington for dietetic technicians, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,704 of extra purchasing power (+8.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietetic technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietetic Technicians

Washington

Median salary
$45,310
Mean salary
$46,730
Employment
370
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$42,341
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietetic Technicians page for Washington →

Dietetic Technicians

Minnesota

Median salary
$45,410
Mean salary
$49,080
Employment
170
Location quotient
0.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$46,045
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietetic Technicians page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietetic technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.