Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Dietitians And Nutritionists Salary: Illinois vs Washington

Dietitians And Nutritionists earn a median of $67,760 in Illinois and $81,050 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $13,290 (-16.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,760
Illinois median
$67,788 after COL
$81,050
Washington median
$75,738 after COL
-16.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-10.5%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $13,290 more per year than Illinois for dietitians and nutritionists, a gap of +16.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,950 of extra purchasing power (+10.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for dietitians and nutritionists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Dietitians And Nutritionists

Illinois

Median salary
$67,760
Mean salary
$69,570
Employment
2,420
Location quotient
0.80
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$67,788
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for Illinois →

Dietitians And Nutritionists

Washington

Median salary
$81,050
Mean salary
$81,140
Employment
1,370
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$75,738
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Dietitians And Nutritionists page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into dietitians and nutritionists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.