Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Drafters, All Other Salary: Vermont vs Nevada

Drafters, All Other earn a median of $58,420 in Vermont and $77,900 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $19,480 (-25.0%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,420
Vermont median
$59,638 after COL
$77,900
Nevada median
$77,916 after COL
-25.0%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-23.5%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $19,480 more per year than Vermont for drafters, all other, a gap of +25.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,279 of extra purchasing power (+23.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for drafters, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Drafters, All Other

Vermont

Median salary
$58,420
Mean salary
$58,850
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$59,638
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Drafters, All Other page for Vermont →

Drafters, All Other

Nevada

Median salary
$77,900
Mean salary
$69,810
Employment
160
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$77,916
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Drafters, All Other page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into drafters, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.