Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Economists Salary: Minnesota vs Georgia

Economists earn a median of $107,470 in Minnesota and $127,220 in Georgia. That is a nominal gap of $19,750 (-15.5%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$107,470
Minnesota median
$108,973 after COL
$127,220
Georgia median
$132,118 after COL
-15.5%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
-17.5%
Adjusted gap
Georgia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $19,750 more per year than Minnesota for economists, a gap of +15.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Georgia still comes out ahead, with roughly $23,145 of extra purchasing power (+17.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for economists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Economists

Minnesota

Median salary
$107,470
Mean salary
$112,460
Employment
210
Location quotient
0.69
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$108,973
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economists page for Minnesota →

Economists

Georgia

Median salary
$127,220
Mean salary
$141,820
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.68
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$132,118
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Economists page for Georgia →

Related pages

Keep digging into economists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.