Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Editors Salary: Kansas vs Connecticut

Editors earn a median of $54,480 in Kansas and $81,910 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $27,430 (-33.5%), with Connecticut paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$54,480
Kansas median
$60,488 after COL
$81,910
Connecticut median
$79,056 after COL
-33.5%
Nominal gap
Connecticut leads
-23.5%
Adjusted gap
Connecticut leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Connecticut pays $27,430 more per year than Kansas for editors, a gap of +33.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Connecticut still comes out ahead, with roughly $18,568 of extra purchasing power (+23.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for editors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Editors

Kansas

Median salary
$54,480
Mean salary
$59,060
Employment
490
Location quotient
0.55
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$60,488
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Editors page for Kansas →

Editors

Connecticut

Median salary
$81,910
Mean salary
$90,790
Employment
1,310
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$79,056
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Editors page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into editors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.