Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Education Administrators, All Other Salary: Connecticut vs Kansas

Education Administrators, All Other earn a median of $97,330 in Connecticut and $115,520 in Kansas. That is a nominal gap of $18,190 (-15.7%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$97,330
Connecticut median
$93,939 after COL
$115,520
Kansas median
$128,259 after COL
-15.7%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
-26.8%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $18,190 more per year than Connecticut for education administrators, all other, a gap of +15.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,320 of extra purchasing power (+26.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for education administrators, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Education Administrators, All Other

Connecticut

Median salary
$97,330
Mean salary
$105,460
Employment
610
Location quotient
1.05
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$93,939
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Education Administrators, All Other page for Connecticut →

Education Administrators, All Other

Kansas

Median salary
$115,520
Mean salary
$108,230
Employment
300
Location quotient
0.60
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$128,259
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Education Administrators, All Other page for Kansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into education administrators, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.