Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Electrical Engineers Salary: Pennsylvania vs California

Electrical Engineers earn a median of $109,730 in Pennsylvania and $140,360 in California. That is a nominal gap of $30,630 (-21.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$109,730
Pennsylvania median
$112,461 after COL
$140,360
California median
$126,770 after COL
-21.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
-11.3%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $30,630 more per year than Pennsylvania for electrical engineers, a gap of +21.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $14,310 of extra purchasing power (+11.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for electrical engineers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Electrical Engineers

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$109,730
Mean salary
$119,550
Employment
7,660
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$112,461
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Electrical Engineers page for Pennsylvania →

Electrical Engineers

California

Median salary
$140,360
Mean salary
$148,390
Employment
23,650
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$126,770
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Electrical Engineers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into electrical engineers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.