Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Engine And Other Machine Assemblers Salary: Utah vs Indiana

Engine And Other Machine Assemblers earn a median of $46,060 in Utah and $73,540 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $27,480 (-37.4%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,060
Utah median
$46,589 after COL
$73,540
Indiana median
$78,797 after COL
-37.4%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-40.9%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $27,480 more per year than Utah for engine and other machine assemblers, a gap of +37.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Indiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $32,207 of extra purchasing power (+40.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for engine and other machine assemblers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Engine And Other Machine Assemblers

Utah

Median salary
$46,060
Mean salary
$46,420
Employment
140
Location quotient
0.32
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$46,589
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Engine And Other Machine Assemblers page for Utah →

Engine And Other Machine Assemblers

Indiana

Median salary
$73,540
Mean salary
$67,070
Employment
5,730
Location quotient
7.22
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$78,797
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Engine And Other Machine Assemblers page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into engine and other machine assemblers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.