Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Engineers, All Other Salary: Minnesota vs Wyoming

Engineers, All Other earn a median of $116,660 in Minnesota and $139,010 in Wyoming. That is a nominal gap of $22,350 (-16.1%), with Wyoming paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$116,660
Minnesota median
$118,291 after COL
$139,010
Wyoming median
$149,971 after COL
-16.1%
Nominal gap
Wyoming leads
-21.1%
Adjusted gap
Wyoming leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Wyoming pays $22,350 more per year than Minnesota for engineers, all other, a gap of +16.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Wyoming still comes out ahead, with roughly $31,680 of extra purchasing power (+21.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for engineers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Engineers, All Other

Minnesota

Median salary
$116,660
Mean salary
$122,620
Employment
1,380
Location quotient
0.48
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$118,291
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Engineers, All Other page for Minnesota →

Engineers, All Other

Wyoming

Median salary
$139,010
Mean salary
$120,990
Employment
190
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$149,971
Regional Price Parity
92.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Engineers, All Other page for Wyoming →

Related pages

Keep digging into engineers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.