Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Etchers And Engravers Salary: Vermont vs Washington

Etchers And Engravers earn a median of $68,030 in Vermont and $57,520 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $10,510 (+18.3%), with Vermont paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$68,030
Vermont median
$69,448 after COL
$57,520
Washington median
$53,750 after COL
+18.3%
Nominal gap
Vermont leads
+29.2%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Vermont pays $10,510 more per year than Washington for etchers and engravers, a gap of +18.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Vermont still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,698 of extra purchasing power (+29.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for etchers and engravers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Etchers And Engravers

Vermont

Median salary
$68,030
Mean salary
$59,860
Employment
30
Location quotient
1.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$69,448
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Etchers And Engravers page for Vermont →

Etchers And Engravers

Washington

Median salary
$57,520
Mean salary
$62,370
Employment
70
Location quotient
0.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$53,750
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Etchers And Engravers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into etchers and engravers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.