Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fallers Salary: Richmond, VA vs Lynchburg, VA

Fallers earn a median of $47,120 in Richmond, VA and $46,140 in Lynchburg, VA. That is a nominal gap of $980 (+2.1%), with Richmond, VA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,120
Richmond, VA median
$48,151 after COL
$46,140
Lynchburg, VA median
$51,632 after COL
+2.1%
Nominal gap
Richmond, VA leads
-6.7%
Adjusted gap
Lynchburg, VA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Richmond, VA pays $980 more per year than Lynchburg, VA for fallers, a gap of +2.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Lynchburg, VA actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,481 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fallers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fallers

Richmond, VA

Median salary
$47,120
Mean salary
$48,790
Employment
50
Location quotient
2.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$48,151
Regional Price Parity
97.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Fallers page for Richmond, VA →

Fallers

Lynchburg, VA

Median salary
$46,140
Mean salary
$44,560
Employment
40
Location quotient
14.23
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$51,632
Regional Price Parity
89.4%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Fallers page for Lynchburg, VA →

Related pages

Keep digging into fallers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.