Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Farm Labor Contractors Salary: California vs Minnesota

Farm Labor Contractors earn a median of $74,120 in California and $49,490 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $24,630 (+49.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$74,120
California median
$66,944 after COL
$49,490
Minnesota median
$50,182 after COL
+49.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
+33.4%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $24,630 more per year than Minnesota for farm labor contractors, a gap of +49.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,762 of extra purchasing power (+33.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for farm labor contractors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Farm Labor Contractors

California

Median salary
$74,120
Mean salary
$73,020
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$66,944
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Farm Labor Contractors page for California →

Farm Labor Contractors

Minnesota

Median salary
$49,490
Mean salary
$49,550
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$50,182
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Farm Labor Contractors page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into farm labor contractors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.