Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fashion Designers Salary: Tennessee vs New Hampshire

Fashion Designers earn a median of $142,500 in Tennessee and $88,230 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $54,270 (+61.5%), with Tennessee paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$142,500
Tennessee median
$155,110 after COL
$88,230
New Hampshire median
$84,702 after COL
+61.5%
Nominal gap
Tennessee leads
+83.1%
Adjusted gap
Tennessee leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Tennessee pays $54,270 more per year than New Hampshire for fashion designers, a gap of +61.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Tennessee still comes out ahead, with roughly $70,408 of extra purchasing power (+83.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fashion designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fashion Designers

Tennessee

Median salary
$142,500
Mean salary
$117,100
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.09
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$155,110
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fashion Designers page for Tennessee →

Fashion Designers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$88,230
Mean salary
$90,750
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$84,702
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fashion Designers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into fashion designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.