Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fence Erectors Salary: Montana vs Pennsylvania

Fence Erectors earn a median of $49,710 in Montana and $56,500 in Pennsylvania. That is a nominal gap of $6,790 (-12.0%), with Pennsylvania paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,710
Montana median
$52,523 after COL
$56,500
Pennsylvania median
$57,906 after COL
-12.0%
Nominal gap
Pennsylvania leads
-9.3%
Adjusted gap
Pennsylvania leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Pennsylvania pays $6,790 more per year than Montana for fence erectors, a gap of +12.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Pennsylvania still comes out ahead, with roughly $5,383 of extra purchasing power (+9.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fence erectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fence Erectors

Montana

Median salary
$49,710
Mean salary
$51,670
Employment
520
Location quotient
7.01
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$52,523
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for Montana →

Fence Erectors

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$56,500
Mean salary
$54,980
Employment
790
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$57,906
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for Pennsylvania →

Related pages

Keep digging into fence erectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.