Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fence Erectors Salary: South Dakota vs Utah

Fence Erectors earn a median of $49,210 in South Dakota and $57,430 in Utah. That is a nominal gap of $8,220 (-14.3%), with Utah paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,210
South Dakota median
$55,551 after COL
$57,430
Utah median
$58,090 after COL
-14.3%
Nominal gap
Utah leads
-4.4%
Adjusted gap
Utah leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Utah pays $8,220 more per year than South Dakota for fence erectors, a gap of +14.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Utah still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,539 of extra purchasing power (+4.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fence erectors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fence Erectors

South Dakota

Median salary
$49,210
Mean salary
$51,990
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$55,551
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for South Dakota →

Fence Erectors

Utah

Median salary
$57,430
Mean salary
$62,760
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$58,090
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fence Erectors page for Utah →

Related pages

Keep digging into fence erectors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.