Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Film And Video Editors Salary: Pennsylvania vs Virginia

Film And Video Editors earn a median of $51,340 in Pennsylvania and $88,310 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $36,970 (-41.9%), with Virginia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$51,340
Pennsylvania median
$52,618 after COL
$88,310
Virginia median
$87,346 after COL
-41.9%
Nominal gap
Virginia leads
-39.8%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Virginia pays $36,970 more per year than Pennsylvania for film and video editors, a gap of +41.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Virginia still comes out ahead, with roughly $34,728 of extra purchasing power (+39.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for film and video editors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Film And Video Editors

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$51,340
Mean salary
$60,870
Employment
790
Location quotient
0.71
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$52,618
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Film And Video Editors page for Pennsylvania →

Film And Video Editors

Virginia

Median salary
$88,310
Mean salary
$81,490
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$87,346
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Film And Video Editors page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into film and video editors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.