Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Financial Clerks, All Other Salary: Connecticut vs Tennessee

Financial Clerks, All Other earn a median of $51,220 in Connecticut and $59,990 in Tennessee. That is a nominal gap of $8,770 (-14.6%), with Tennessee paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$51,220
Connecticut median
$49,435 after COL
$59,990
Tennessee median
$65,299 after COL
-14.6%
Nominal gap
Tennessee leads
-24.3%
Adjusted gap
Tennessee leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Tennessee pays $8,770 more per year than Connecticut for financial clerks, all other, a gap of +14.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Tennessee still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,863 of extra purchasing power (+24.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial clerks, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Clerks, All Other

Connecticut

Median salary
$51,220
Mean salary
$55,240
Employment
390
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$49,435
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Clerks, All Other page for Connecticut →

Financial Clerks, All Other

Tennessee

Median salary
$59,990
Mean salary
$62,380
Employment
320
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$65,299
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Clerks, All Other page for Tennessee →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial clerks, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.