Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Financial Examiners Salary: Mississippi vs Washington

Financial Examiners earn a median of $92,590 in Mississippi and $110,340 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $17,750 (-16.1%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$92,590
Mississippi median
$106,483 after COL
$110,340
Washington median
$103,109 after COL
-16.1%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+3.3%
Adjusted gap
Mississippi leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $17,750 more per year than Mississippi for financial examiners, a gap of +16.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Mississippi actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,374 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial examiners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Examiners

Mississippi

Median salary
$92,590
Mean salary
$97,400
Employment
340
Location quotient
0.72
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$106,483
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for Mississippi →

Financial Examiners

Washington

Median salary
$110,340
Mean salary
$113,320
Employment
410
Location quotient
0.29
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$103,109
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial examiners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.