Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Financial Examiners Salary: West Virginia vs California

Financial Examiners earn a median of $60,440 in West Virginia and $105,790 in California. That is a nominal gap of $45,350 (-42.9%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,440
West Virginia median
$67,533 after COL
$105,790
California median
$95,547 after COL
-42.9%
Nominal gap
California leads
-29.3%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $45,350 more per year than West Virginia for financial examiners, a gap of +42.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $28,014 of extra purchasing power (+29.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for financial examiners in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Financial Examiners

West Virginia

Median salary
$60,440
Mean salary
$68,130
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$67,533
Regional Price Parity
89.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for West Virginia →

Financial Examiners

California

Median salary
$105,790
Mean salary
$118,360
Employment
3,690
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$95,547
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Financial Examiners page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into financial examiners from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.