Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Firefighters Salary: Texas vs District of Columbia

Firefighters earn a median of $60,840 in Texas and $79,430 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $18,590 (-23.4%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,840
Texas median
$62,685 after COL
$79,430
District of Columbia median
$72,274 after COL
-23.4%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-13.3%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $18,590 more per year than Texas for firefighters, a gap of +23.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,589 of extra purchasing power (+13.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for firefighters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Firefighters

Texas

Median salary
$60,840
Mean salary
$60,880
Employment
30,400
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$62,685
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Firefighters page for Texas →

Firefighters

District of Columbia

Median salary
$79,430
Mean salary
$80,320
Employment
1,430
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$72,274
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Firefighters page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into firefighters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.