Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fish And Game Wardens Salary: Maryland vs Texas

Fish And Game Wardens earn a median of $87,180 in Maryland and $81,880 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $5,300 (+6.5%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$87,180
Maryland median
$83,061 after COL
$81,880
Texas median
$84,363 after COL
+6.5%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $5,300 more per year than Texas for fish and game wardens, a gap of +6.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Texas actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,302 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fish and game wardens in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fish And Game Wardens

Maryland

Median salary
$87,180
Mean salary
$88,420
Employment
30
Location quotient
0.30
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$83,061
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for Maryland →

Fish And Game Wardens

Texas

Median salary
$81,880
Mean salary
$77,910
Employment
480
Location quotient
0.83
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$84,363
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fish And Game Wardens page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into fish and game wardens from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.