Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Floral Designers Salary: New York vs Massachusetts

Floral Designers earn a median of $44,070 in New York and $43,250 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $820 (+1.9%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$44,070
New York median
$40,835 after COL
$43,250
Massachusetts median
$40,896 after COL
+1.9%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-0.1%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $820 more per year than Massachusetts for floral designers, a gap of +1.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Massachusetts actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $60 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for floral designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Floral Designers

New York

Median salary
$44,070
Mean salary
$45,050
Employment
2,090
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$40,835
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Floral Designers page for New York →

Floral Designers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$43,250
Mean salary
$45,930
Employment
990
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$40,896
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Floral Designers page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into floral designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.