Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Food Science Technicians Salary: Iowa vs Massachusetts

Food Science Technicians earn a median of $47,610 in Iowa and $57,400 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $9,790 (-17.1%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$47,610
Iowa median
$54,249 after COL
$57,400
Massachusetts median
$54,275 after COL
-17.1%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
-0.0%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $9,790 more per year than Iowa for food science technicians, a gap of +17.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $26 of extra purchasing power (+0.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food science technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Science Technicians

Iowa

Median salary
$47,610
Mean salary
$49,990
Employment
400
Location quotient
2.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$54,249
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Iowa →

Food Science Technicians

Massachusetts

Median salary
$57,400
Mean salary
$59,590
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$54,275
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Science Technicians page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into food science technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.