Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Food Service Managers Salary: Arizona vs Rhode Island

Food Service Managers earn a median of $63,310 in Arizona and $82,300 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $18,990 (-23.1%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$63,310
Arizona median
$62,884 after COL
$82,300
Rhode Island median
$80,465 after COL
-23.1%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-21.8%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $18,990 more per year than Arizona for food service managers, a gap of +23.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $17,581 of extra purchasing power (+21.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for food service managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Food Service Managers

Arizona

Median salary
$63,310
Mean salary
$68,000
Employment
5,010
Location quotient
0.99
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$62,884
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for Arizona →

Food Service Managers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$82,300
Mean salary
$80,710
Employment
860
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$80,465
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Food Service Managers page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into food service managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.