Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Forensic Science Technicians Salary: California vs Illinois

Forensic Science Technicians earn a median of $96,850 in California and $117,590 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $20,740 (-17.6%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$96,850
California median
$87,473 after COL
$117,590
Illinois median
$117,639 after COL
-17.6%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-25.6%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $20,740 more per year than California for forensic science technicians, a gap of +17.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $30,167 of extra purchasing power (+25.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for forensic science technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Forensic Science Technicians

California

Median salary
$96,850
Mean salary
$99,390
Employment
3,100
Location quotient
1.36
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$87,473
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forensic Science Technicians page for California →

Forensic Science Technicians

Illinois

Median salary
$117,590
Mean salary
$106,120
Employment
380
Location quotient
0.50
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$117,639
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forensic Science Technicians page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into forensic science technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.