Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Foresters Salary: Oklahoma vs Iowa

Foresters earn a median of $48,810 in Oklahoma and $80,590 in Iowa. That is a nominal gap of $31,780 (-39.4%), with Iowa paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,810
Oklahoma median
$55,565 after COL
$80,590
Iowa median
$91,828 after COL
-39.4%
Nominal gap
Iowa leads
-39.5%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Iowa pays $31,780 more per year than Oklahoma for foresters, a gap of +39.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Iowa still comes out ahead, with roughly $36,263 of extra purchasing power (+39.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for foresters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Foresters

Oklahoma

Median salary
$48,810
Mean salary
$56,850
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$55,565
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Foresters page for Oklahoma →

Foresters

Iowa

Median salary
$80,590
Mean salary
$75,260
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$91,828
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Foresters page for Iowa →

Related pages

Keep digging into foresters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.