Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Cage Workers Salary: Indiana vs Maryland

Gambling Cage Workers earn a median of $36,890 in Indiana and $41,530 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $4,640 (-11.2%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,890
Indiana median
$39,527 after COL
$41,530
Maryland median
$39,568 after COL
-11.2%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-0.1%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $4,640 more per year than Indiana for gambling cage workers, a gap of +11.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $41 of extra purchasing power (+0.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling cage workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Cage Workers

Indiana

Median salary
$36,890
Mean salary
$38,850
Employment
310
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$39,527
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Indiana →

Gambling Cage Workers

Maryland

Median salary
$41,530
Mean salary
$41,210
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.62
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$39,568
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling cage workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.