Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Cage Workers Salary: Kansas vs Arizona

Gambling Cage Workers earn a median of $34,850 in Kansas and $46,000 in Arizona. That is a nominal gap of $11,150 (-24.2%), with Arizona paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$34,850
Kansas median
$38,693 after COL
$46,000
Arizona median
$45,691 after COL
-24.2%
Nominal gap
Arizona leads
-15.3%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Arizona pays $11,150 more per year than Kansas for gambling cage workers, a gap of +24.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Arizona still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,998 of extra purchasing power (+15.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling cage workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Cage Workers

Kansas

Median salary
$34,850
Mean salary
$36,100
Employment
90
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$38,693
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Kansas →

Gambling Cage Workers

Arizona

Median salary
$46,000
Mean salary
$45,590
Employment
640
Location quotient
2.27
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$45,691
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Arizona →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling cage workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.