Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Cage Workers Salary: New York vs Florida

Gambling Cage Workers earn a median of $46,530 in New York and $41,660 in Florida. That is a nominal gap of $4,870 (+11.7%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,530
New York median
$43,115 after COL
$41,660
Florida median
$40,285 after COL
+11.7%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+7.0%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $4,870 more per year than Florida for gambling cage workers, a gap of +11.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,830 of extra purchasing power (+7.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling cage workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Cage Workers

New York

Median salary
$46,530
Mean salary
$45,040
Employment
360
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$43,115
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for New York →

Gambling Cage Workers

Florida

Median salary
$41,660
Mean salary
$40,160
Employment
560
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$40,285
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Florida →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling cage workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.