Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Gambling Dealers Salary: Pennsylvania vs Texas

Gambling Dealers earn a median of $36,130 in Pennsylvania and $39,990 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $3,860 (-9.7%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$36,130
Pennsylvania median
$37,029 after COL
$39,990
Texas median
$41,203 after COL
-9.7%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-10.1%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $3,860 more per year than Pennsylvania for gambling dealers, a gap of +9.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,174 of extra purchasing power (+10.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling dealers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Dealers

Pennsylvania

Median salary
$36,130
Mean salary
$41,630
Employment
2,560
Location quotient
0.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$37,029
Regional Price Parity
97.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Dealers page for Pennsylvania →

Gambling Dealers

Texas

Median salary
$39,990
Mean salary
$35,100
Employment
620
Location quotient
0.08
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$41,203
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Dealers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling dealers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.